Compare AU
Compare MAUCA vs. A200
Compare shares and ETFs on the ASX that you can trade on Pearler.
Industry & Region
Country Exposure
MAUCA | A200 | |
|---|---|---|
Australia | 100.00 % | 95.07 % |
United States | 3.04 % | |
New Zealand | 1.41 % | |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 0.38 % | |
China | 0.09 % |
Industry Exposure
Key differences
•
MAUCA has a higher allocation (100.00 %) in the Materials sector than A200 (18.08 %).
•
MAUCA is only exposed to Materials (100.00 %). Comparatively, A200 is most exposed to Financials (33.78 %), Materials (18.08 %), and Health Care (8.68 %).
MAUCA | A200 | |
|---|---|---|
Materials | 100.00 % | 18.08 % |
Financials | 33.78 % | |
Health Care | 8.68 % | |
Consumer Discretionary | 7.63 % | |
Real Estate | 6.81 % | |
Industrials | 6.51 % | |
Energy | 3.83 % | |
Communication Services | 3.53 % | |
Consumer Staples | 3.50 % | |
Other | 3.37 % | |
Information Technology | 2.91 % | |
Utilities | 1.37 % |